Monday 14 November 2011

The Who, 1965 and 1971

The Who were, alongside The BeatlesThe Rolling Stones, The Kinks, the Small Faces and numerous others, part of the British ‘Beat group’ explosion of new ‘Pop’ bands in the early to mid-1960s. They reached number 2 in the UK single charts in 1965 with ‘My Generation’. The clip below skilfully edits together TV and live footage of The Who at various stages in their career between 1964 and 1978. It shows many of the trends in music and fashion which The Who both led and reflected. We see them as a young ‘Mod’ band; as part of the ‘psychedelic’ era of the late 1960s, and, ultimately, as one of the most globally popular (and for many years officially the loudest) of the ‘stadium rock’ bands of the 1970s.
Some questions to think about:
- Can any band represent an entire generation? Do you think that is what The Who were, in fact, trying to do?
- Is the thinking behind the lyrics of ‘My Generation’ drastically different (and does the song sound drastically different) from what Punk rockers The Sex Pistols would be doing 11 years later?


The 1971 performance of ‘Won’t Get Fooled Again’ below is preceded by a snippet from an interview in which a young Jeremy Paxman questions guitarist and songwriter Pete Townshend about the excesses of The Who’s ‘rock ‘n’ roll’ lifestyle. ‘Won’t Get Fooled Again’ was one of the first rock songs to use that important new piece of music-making technology: the synthesizer.
– Do the lyrics of ‘Won’t Get Fooled Again’ suggest a change in attitude from ‘My Generation’? Or are we wrong to think that pop music has a ‘message’?

The Beatles in 1967

In this clip from June 1967, The Beatles, by now a global phenomenon, perform their new song ‘All You Need Is Love’ as the climax of the first ever live, international satellite television broadcast, Our World. The BBC co-ordinated this show which reached an unprecedented world-wide TV audience of 400 million (and would have been seen by many millions more had not the USSR and Soviet Bloc countries pulled out a week before the broadcast). Amongst those in the audience is Mick Jagger of The Rolling Stones. In keeping with the international nature of event, the song begins with the French national anthem, ‘La Marseillaise’; a rare moment of Europhilia in recent British popular culture.
NB: the original broadcast was transmitted (and videotaped) entirely in black and white. The exceptionally good job of ‘colourizing’ this clip was carried out for The Beatles 1995 Anthology documentary series.
The version of ‘All You Need Is Love’ recorded during this broadcast was promptly released as a single. Although John Lennon, the song’s composer, insisted on re-recording his vocals, little else was over-dubbed onto the live recording. Within weeks of their album Sgt Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band reaching number 1 around the world, ‘All You Need Is Love’ did the same. It was The Beatles’ twelfth UK number 1 single.

‘Good old Mr Wilson’ meets ‘our friends The Beatles’ (1964)

Here is a wonderfully evocative newsreel clip, showing a famous early example of pop stars meeting politicians. Who benefited more on this occasion?


The Beatles were not Britain’s first pop stars. Performers such as Tommy Steele, ‘Skiffle’ king Lonnie Donegan and teenager Cliff Richard (Britain’s answer to Elvis Presley) had great domestic success in the early days of rock and roll in the late 1950s.
What made The Beatles so different and so important? They were, in 1964, the first British act to take America – and then the world – by storm. They led the pop-cultural ‘British Invasion’ of the US, which included numerous bands, new, working-class film stars with regional accents such as Michael Caine and Sean Connery, and the fashions of Mary Quant and Carnaby Street. Unlike previous ‘recording artists’, The Beatles composed their own songs and played their own instruments. They made standard the guitar/bass/drums line-up which has dominated pop music ever since. Also, the media and many sections of the public adored their cheeky Scouse wit and their four, distinctive personalities. Therefore, while they were not a ‘manufactured’ act, they were, arguably, the first example of what would later be called a ‘boy band’.
Leader of the Opposition Harold Wilson quotes the music critic of The Times to demonstrate that, three years before they made Sergeant Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, The Beatles were also one of the first pop acts to be analyzed as ‘serious’ music (although most record-buyers in 1964 just thought they wrote good pop songs). The soon-to-be Prime Minister recommended to the Queen that ‘our friends The Beatles’ be made MBEs in 1965: the first pop stars to be honoured in such a way.
What you don’t see in this clip, however, is ”Arold’s’ great embarrassment at John Lennon’s joke about ‘purple hearts’. What was Lennon referring to?

‘It’s Austin Powers!’ (and ‘A Hard Day’s Night’)

Part-time fashion photographer and full-time International Man of Mystery Austin Powers, played by Mike Myers.
Consider this clip in relation to the April 1966 Time magazine article in the course document pack which popularized the phrase ‘Swinging London’.
– How many of the ‘Pop’ fashions and icons which the article addresses can you identify in this opening sequence?
– How important are these in the ongoing myth of the ‘Swinging Sixties’?


Jay Roach’s 1997 film, the first in the Austin Powers trilogy, pays homage to several British (or US-UK) films of the 1960s, particularly the first two James Bond films Dr No (1962) and From Russia With Love(1963). Above all, however, the title sequence parodies, affectionately, the unprecedented hysteria of early Beatlemania portrayed in the opening of A Hard Day’s Night (Richard Lester, 1964).

British Film in the 1960s

A decade of radical change - not least for British cinema
Main image of British Film in the 1960s
The beginning of the 1960s found a British cinema in transition. The giants of previous decades were mostly on the wane: Michael Powell made one dazzling film, Peeping Tom(1960), but suffered a ferocious critical mauling which shredded his reputation; Carol Reed had a huge hit - and won an Oscar - with the uncharacteristic Oliver! (1968), but none of his '60s films scaled the heights ofThe Third Man (1949). The exception wasDavid Lean, who was now painting on the grandest of canvases. He released just two films in the decade, the monumental Lawrence of Arabia (1962) and the equally epic, if less coherent, Dr Zhivago (1965), but his status as the colossus of British cinema was assured.
Of the studios that had dominated the postwar period, only Rank atPinewood and Associated British at Elstree survived, both Ealing andLondon Films having collapsed by 1958. The space they left behind was filled increasingly by American studios, which invested in British films to a degree not seen since the 1930s. The government-backed British Lion, operating as an umbrella for film production and distribution, went some way to keeping afloat a domestic industry already suffering from the impact of television.
The trickle of socially conscious films that had begun to emerge at the end of the previous decade now became a high-profile, if shortlived 'new wave'. Saturday Night and Sunday Morning (d. Karel Reisz, 1960) continued the determined northern working-class focus that had already transformed British theatre and literature. Its (anti-) hero, Arthur Seaton, was another 'angry young man' - railing against work and the 'bastards' - of the kind that was now becoming familiar to British audiences. Further examples appeared in the early years of the decade, mostly, likeSaturday Night, by directors associated with the 1950s Free Cinema movement: A Kind of Loving (d. John Schlesinger, 1962), The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner (d. Tony Richardson, 1962), Billy Liar (d. Schlesinger, 1963) and This Sporting Life (d. Lindsay Anderson, 1963). The films gave opportunities to a new breed of dynamic young actors -Albert FinneyAlan BatesTom Courtenay and Richard Harris.
By the middle of the decade, the focus was back on London, newly confident as the home of a thriving music and fashion scene that was envied worldwide. The 'swinging London' phenomenon spawned a coterie of films, many of which seemed to be about the failure of their protagonists to get in on the boom - Georgy Girl (d. Silvio Narrizano, 1966), The Knack... (d. Richard Lester, 1965), the Stevenage-set Here We Go Round the Mulberry Bush (d. Clive Donner, 1967). The emptiness of the scene was exposed in Darling (d. Schlesinger, 1965), whose star,Julie Christie, was another of the decade's genuine discoveries.
But no mere film star could hope to match the popularity of The Beatles, who developed a more complex screen presence in A Hard Day's Night(d. Richard Lester, 1964), Help! (d. Lester, 1965) and, in animated form, in Yellow Submarine (d. George Dunning, 1968), than had Cliff Richard inThe Young Ones (d. Sidney J. Furie, 1961) and Summer Holiday (d. Peter Yates, 1962). The rather less stellar Dave Clark Five failed to match the Fab Four's screen success with Catch Us If You Can (d. John Boorman, 1965), but it was an interesting debut for its director, who, in what was becoming a depressing trend, immediately upped sticks for Hollywood (although Boorman has made many films here since).
Meanwhile, the buzz around all things British attracted several foreign directors to these shores. With Blow-Up (1966), Italian Michelangelo Antonioni delivered an unusually acute 'swinging London' movie, while the Polish Roman Polanski, passing through on his way to Hollywood, offered an even darker vision with Repulsion (1965) and Cul-de-Sac (1966). The visitors also included two leading lights of the French nouvelle vague,François Truffaut (Fahrenheit 451, 1968) and Jean-Luc Godard (One Plus One/Sympathy for the Devil, 1968). Another new arrival was Stanley Kubrick, who made England his home after making Lolita at Elstree in 1961, even if his films didn't always reflect the environment in which they were made; the gargantuan, psychedelic voyage of 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) did, however, feature a number of Brits among the minor players. Kubrick's fellow American Joseph Losey had arrived some years earlier, and in films like The Criminal (1960), The Servant (1963) andAccident (1967) he brought an analytical outsider's eye to very English subjects.
English through and through was the Carry On series, which had begun at the tail-end of the '50s with Carry On Sergeant (d. Gerald Thomas, 1958) and became an institution during the '60s. A total of 16 films appeared before the decade was out, and the series quickly settled into an easily repackaged formula of mildly risqué humour, genre spoof and caricature, with soon familiar names like Sid JamesKenneth Williams and Hattie Jacques reprising equally familiar roles.
1962 heralded the arrival of a still more successful franchise, with the release of Dr No (d. Terence Young). It was a relatively low-key introduction for Ian Fleming's superspy hero James Bond, but the series was well into gear by the time of Goldfinger (d. Guy Hamilton, 1964).Sean Connery had been waiting for a break for half a decade, but the role of Bond fitted him as snugly as the frogman suit he wore for much ofThunderball (d. Terence Young, 1965). Bond became one of the decade's iconic figures, unflappable, sophisticated, sexy and very British.
Bond's unstoppable success led to many imitators, the best of which was the trio of films featuring Len Deighton's anonymous masterspy, now given the name Harry Palmer. Michael Caine was already on the rise thanks to Zulu (d. Cy Endfield, 1964), but The Ipcress File (d. Sidney J. Furie, 1965) confirmed him as one of the faces of modern Britain. Its two sequels, Funeral in Berlin (d. Guy Hamilton, 1966) and Billion Dollar Brain(d. Ken Russell, 1967), didn't quite match the first film's impact, but by the end of the decade the former porter from Smithfields meat market was a worldwide superstar, thanks to similarly punchy performances inAlfie (d. Lewis Gilbert, 1966), and The Italian Job (d. Peter Collinson, 1969).
Less popular with critics but just as successful with audiences, Hammer Studios extended its Dracula and Frankenstein franchises, but also released a number of imaginative one-offs, among them The Nanny(1965) and Plague of the Zombies (1966), upping the sex quotient as the decade wore on and censorship relaxed. A number of smaller studios, likeAmicus and Tigon, followed in Hammer's wake, throwing up much derivative nonsense, but also the odd gem, like Michael Reeves'Witchfinder General (1968).
By the end of the decade, the sheen of youthful optimism was wearing off. The war in Vietnam attracted huge opposition, but carried on regardless. The hippie generation was beginning to recognise that naïve pacifism couldn't hope to compete with entrenched state power that was prepared to use force to crush protest, as events in America, at Ohio's Kent State University and the Chicago Democratic Convention, demonstrated. The strikes and occupations of May 1968 in Paris seemed momentarily to mark the beginning of genuine revolution; a feeling captured in Lindsay Anderson's If.... (1969). Meanwhile, the promise of 'peace and love' was turning to paranoia, madness and despair.Performance (d. Donald Cammell/Nicolas Roeg), completed in 1968 but held back until 1970 by an anxious Warner Bros, showed a very unswinging London, in which the psychedelic dream had turned nightmare.
Mark Duguid

Wednesday 4 May 2011

FS2 Exam Topics

Main study areas and topic within each area to study for the exam. You may not be able to cover them all – but here a range of topics within each area.

Films as products

The global and local dimensions of film
Hollywood
Film Studios
Films as commercial products
Adaptability of the film industry
Filmmaking: the process
Film production, distribution and exhibition


Audiences as fans and consumers

The early cinema experience ( nice to know but unlikely to come up)
Changing patterns of consumption including multi-screen cinemas and home cinema ( a favourite topic in the exam)
The role of the audience in the filmmaking process
Censorship and classification
Fan power
Industry power
Globalization

Hollywood back in the day and Hollywood today – Old Hollywood and New Hollywood
Old Hollywood and New Hollywood. How does Hollywood today compare with the Hollywood of the 1940s-50s?
Actors, directors and agents
Producers
Production: an overview
Distribution in Old Hollywood and New Hollywood

Is the British film industry in any way distinctive and different?
How does it cope with having to survive in the shadow of Hollywood?
A distinctive and different cinema

Tuesday 26 April 2011

Example Exam Questions



The Film Industry

  • To what extent are Hollywood films simply ‘products’ made to make a profit?
  • How important is marketing in influencing people to watch Hollywood films both at the cinema and on DVD?
  • How are billboard posters and poster-style advertisements in newspapers and magazines used to create audiences for films?

The Film Audience

  • What role does the internet now play in enabling people to develop their interest in films?
  • In what ways do factors such as who we watch films with and where we watch films influence our viewing experience and our response to film material?
  • How has the experience of watching films changed in recent years and how do you think it might develop in the future?

Stars

  • To what extent are star images controlled by the film industry?
  • To what extent are fans now able to determine the success or failure of individual stars?
  • What are some of the ways in which fans and the film industry work together to create a star’s image?

Swinging Britain 1963–1973

  • What for you are the most striking uses of narrative construction in the films you have studied?
  • Do the directors of the films you have studied employ narrative in particular ways to say make comment on class in this period?
  • The films of Swinging Britain are essentially about freedom.  Discuss how the films you have studied present freedom.
  • Is there any benefit to understanding the narrative structures in the films of Swinging Britain in exploring the cultural context of the films you have studied?
  • What particular Micro aspects employed in the films you have studied are significant in advancing either Narrative or Genre in the Swinging Britain period?