Monday 14 November 2011

The Who, 1965 and 1971

The Who were, alongside The BeatlesThe Rolling Stones, The Kinks, the Small Faces and numerous others, part of the British ‘Beat group’ explosion of new ‘Pop’ bands in the early to mid-1960s. They reached number 2 in the UK single charts in 1965 with ‘My Generation’. The clip below skilfully edits together TV and live footage of The Who at various stages in their career between 1964 and 1978. It shows many of the trends in music and fashion which The Who both led and reflected. We see them as a young ‘Mod’ band; as part of the ‘psychedelic’ era of the late 1960s, and, ultimately, as one of the most globally popular (and for many years officially the loudest) of the ‘stadium rock’ bands of the 1970s.
Some questions to think about:
- Can any band represent an entire generation? Do you think that is what The Who were, in fact, trying to do?
- Is the thinking behind the lyrics of ‘My Generation’ drastically different (and does the song sound drastically different) from what Punk rockers The Sex Pistols would be doing 11 years later?


The 1971 performance of ‘Won’t Get Fooled Again’ below is preceded by a snippet from an interview in which a young Jeremy Paxman questions guitarist and songwriter Pete Townshend about the excesses of The Who’s ‘rock ‘n’ roll’ lifestyle. ‘Won’t Get Fooled Again’ was one of the first rock songs to use that important new piece of music-making technology: the synthesizer.
– Do the lyrics of ‘Won’t Get Fooled Again’ suggest a change in attitude from ‘My Generation’? Or are we wrong to think that pop music has a ‘message’?

The Beatles in 1967

In this clip from June 1967, The Beatles, by now a global phenomenon, perform their new song ‘All You Need Is Love’ as the climax of the first ever live, international satellite television broadcast, Our World. The BBC co-ordinated this show which reached an unprecedented world-wide TV audience of 400 million (and would have been seen by many millions more had not the USSR and Soviet Bloc countries pulled out a week before the broadcast). Amongst those in the audience is Mick Jagger of The Rolling Stones. In keeping with the international nature of event, the song begins with the French national anthem, ‘La Marseillaise’; a rare moment of Europhilia in recent British popular culture.
NB: the original broadcast was transmitted (and videotaped) entirely in black and white. The exceptionally good job of ‘colourizing’ this clip was carried out for The Beatles 1995 Anthology documentary series.
The version of ‘All You Need Is Love’ recorded during this broadcast was promptly released as a single. Although John Lennon, the song’s composer, insisted on re-recording his vocals, little else was over-dubbed onto the live recording. Within weeks of their album Sgt Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band reaching number 1 around the world, ‘All You Need Is Love’ did the same. It was The Beatles’ twelfth UK number 1 single.

‘Good old Mr Wilson’ meets ‘our friends The Beatles’ (1964)

Here is a wonderfully evocative newsreel clip, showing a famous early example of pop stars meeting politicians. Who benefited more on this occasion?


The Beatles were not Britain’s first pop stars. Performers such as Tommy Steele, ‘Skiffle’ king Lonnie Donegan and teenager Cliff Richard (Britain’s answer to Elvis Presley) had great domestic success in the early days of rock and roll in the late 1950s.
What made The Beatles so different and so important? They were, in 1964, the first British act to take America – and then the world – by storm. They led the pop-cultural ‘British Invasion’ of the US, which included numerous bands, new, working-class film stars with regional accents such as Michael Caine and Sean Connery, and the fashions of Mary Quant and Carnaby Street. Unlike previous ‘recording artists’, The Beatles composed their own songs and played their own instruments. They made standard the guitar/bass/drums line-up which has dominated pop music ever since. Also, the media and many sections of the public adored their cheeky Scouse wit and their four, distinctive personalities. Therefore, while they were not a ‘manufactured’ act, they were, arguably, the first example of what would later be called a ‘boy band’.
Leader of the Opposition Harold Wilson quotes the music critic of The Times to demonstrate that, three years before they made Sergeant Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, The Beatles were also one of the first pop acts to be analyzed as ‘serious’ music (although most record-buyers in 1964 just thought they wrote good pop songs). The soon-to-be Prime Minister recommended to the Queen that ‘our friends The Beatles’ be made MBEs in 1965: the first pop stars to be honoured in such a way.
What you don’t see in this clip, however, is ”Arold’s’ great embarrassment at John Lennon’s joke about ‘purple hearts’. What was Lennon referring to?

‘It’s Austin Powers!’ (and ‘A Hard Day’s Night’)

Part-time fashion photographer and full-time International Man of Mystery Austin Powers, played by Mike Myers.
Consider this clip in relation to the April 1966 Time magazine article in the course document pack which popularized the phrase ‘Swinging London’.
– How many of the ‘Pop’ fashions and icons which the article addresses can you identify in this opening sequence?
– How important are these in the ongoing myth of the ‘Swinging Sixties’?


Jay Roach’s 1997 film, the first in the Austin Powers trilogy, pays homage to several British (or US-UK) films of the 1960s, particularly the first two James Bond films Dr No (1962) and From Russia With Love(1963). Above all, however, the title sequence parodies, affectionately, the unprecedented hysteria of early Beatlemania portrayed in the opening of A Hard Day’s Night (Richard Lester, 1964).

British Film in the 1960s

A decade of radical change - not least for British cinema
Main image of British Film in the 1960s
The beginning of the 1960s found a British cinema in transition. The giants of previous decades were mostly on the wane: Michael Powell made one dazzling film, Peeping Tom(1960), but suffered a ferocious critical mauling which shredded his reputation; Carol Reed had a huge hit - and won an Oscar - with the uncharacteristic Oliver! (1968), but none of his '60s films scaled the heights ofThe Third Man (1949). The exception wasDavid Lean, who was now painting on the grandest of canvases. He released just two films in the decade, the monumental Lawrence of Arabia (1962) and the equally epic, if less coherent, Dr Zhivago (1965), but his status as the colossus of British cinema was assured.
Of the studios that had dominated the postwar period, only Rank atPinewood and Associated British at Elstree survived, both Ealing andLondon Films having collapsed by 1958. The space they left behind was filled increasingly by American studios, which invested in British films to a degree not seen since the 1930s. The government-backed British Lion, operating as an umbrella for film production and distribution, went some way to keeping afloat a domestic industry already suffering from the impact of television.
The trickle of socially conscious films that had begun to emerge at the end of the previous decade now became a high-profile, if shortlived 'new wave'. Saturday Night and Sunday Morning (d. Karel Reisz, 1960) continued the determined northern working-class focus that had already transformed British theatre and literature. Its (anti-) hero, Arthur Seaton, was another 'angry young man' - railing against work and the 'bastards' - of the kind that was now becoming familiar to British audiences. Further examples appeared in the early years of the decade, mostly, likeSaturday Night, by directors associated with the 1950s Free Cinema movement: A Kind of Loving (d. John Schlesinger, 1962), The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner (d. Tony Richardson, 1962), Billy Liar (d. Schlesinger, 1963) and This Sporting Life (d. Lindsay Anderson, 1963). The films gave opportunities to a new breed of dynamic young actors -Albert FinneyAlan BatesTom Courtenay and Richard Harris.
By the middle of the decade, the focus was back on London, newly confident as the home of a thriving music and fashion scene that was envied worldwide. The 'swinging London' phenomenon spawned a coterie of films, many of which seemed to be about the failure of their protagonists to get in on the boom - Georgy Girl (d. Silvio Narrizano, 1966), The Knack... (d. Richard Lester, 1965), the Stevenage-set Here We Go Round the Mulberry Bush (d. Clive Donner, 1967). The emptiness of the scene was exposed in Darling (d. Schlesinger, 1965), whose star,Julie Christie, was another of the decade's genuine discoveries.
But no mere film star could hope to match the popularity of The Beatles, who developed a more complex screen presence in A Hard Day's Night(d. Richard Lester, 1964), Help! (d. Lester, 1965) and, in animated form, in Yellow Submarine (d. George Dunning, 1968), than had Cliff Richard inThe Young Ones (d. Sidney J. Furie, 1961) and Summer Holiday (d. Peter Yates, 1962). The rather less stellar Dave Clark Five failed to match the Fab Four's screen success with Catch Us If You Can (d. John Boorman, 1965), but it was an interesting debut for its director, who, in what was becoming a depressing trend, immediately upped sticks for Hollywood (although Boorman has made many films here since).
Meanwhile, the buzz around all things British attracted several foreign directors to these shores. With Blow-Up (1966), Italian Michelangelo Antonioni delivered an unusually acute 'swinging London' movie, while the Polish Roman Polanski, passing through on his way to Hollywood, offered an even darker vision with Repulsion (1965) and Cul-de-Sac (1966). The visitors also included two leading lights of the French nouvelle vague,François Truffaut (Fahrenheit 451, 1968) and Jean-Luc Godard (One Plus One/Sympathy for the Devil, 1968). Another new arrival was Stanley Kubrick, who made England his home after making Lolita at Elstree in 1961, even if his films didn't always reflect the environment in which they were made; the gargantuan, psychedelic voyage of 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) did, however, feature a number of Brits among the minor players. Kubrick's fellow American Joseph Losey had arrived some years earlier, and in films like The Criminal (1960), The Servant (1963) andAccident (1967) he brought an analytical outsider's eye to very English subjects.
English through and through was the Carry On series, which had begun at the tail-end of the '50s with Carry On Sergeant (d. Gerald Thomas, 1958) and became an institution during the '60s. A total of 16 films appeared before the decade was out, and the series quickly settled into an easily repackaged formula of mildly risqué humour, genre spoof and caricature, with soon familiar names like Sid JamesKenneth Williams and Hattie Jacques reprising equally familiar roles.
1962 heralded the arrival of a still more successful franchise, with the release of Dr No (d. Terence Young). It was a relatively low-key introduction for Ian Fleming's superspy hero James Bond, but the series was well into gear by the time of Goldfinger (d. Guy Hamilton, 1964).Sean Connery had been waiting for a break for half a decade, but the role of Bond fitted him as snugly as the frogman suit he wore for much ofThunderball (d. Terence Young, 1965). Bond became one of the decade's iconic figures, unflappable, sophisticated, sexy and very British.
Bond's unstoppable success led to many imitators, the best of which was the trio of films featuring Len Deighton's anonymous masterspy, now given the name Harry Palmer. Michael Caine was already on the rise thanks to Zulu (d. Cy Endfield, 1964), but The Ipcress File (d. Sidney J. Furie, 1965) confirmed him as one of the faces of modern Britain. Its two sequels, Funeral in Berlin (d. Guy Hamilton, 1966) and Billion Dollar Brain(d. Ken Russell, 1967), didn't quite match the first film's impact, but by the end of the decade the former porter from Smithfields meat market was a worldwide superstar, thanks to similarly punchy performances inAlfie (d. Lewis Gilbert, 1966), and The Italian Job (d. Peter Collinson, 1969).
Less popular with critics but just as successful with audiences, Hammer Studios extended its Dracula and Frankenstein franchises, but also released a number of imaginative one-offs, among them The Nanny(1965) and Plague of the Zombies (1966), upping the sex quotient as the decade wore on and censorship relaxed. A number of smaller studios, likeAmicus and Tigon, followed in Hammer's wake, throwing up much derivative nonsense, but also the odd gem, like Michael Reeves'Witchfinder General (1968).
By the end of the decade, the sheen of youthful optimism was wearing off. The war in Vietnam attracted huge opposition, but carried on regardless. The hippie generation was beginning to recognise that naïve pacifism couldn't hope to compete with entrenched state power that was prepared to use force to crush protest, as events in America, at Ohio's Kent State University and the Chicago Democratic Convention, demonstrated. The strikes and occupations of May 1968 in Paris seemed momentarily to mark the beginning of genuine revolution; a feeling captured in Lindsay Anderson's If.... (1969). Meanwhile, the promise of 'peace and love' was turning to paranoia, madness and despair.Performance (d. Donald Cammell/Nicolas Roeg), completed in 1968 but held back until 1970 by an anxious Warner Bros, showed a very unswinging London, in which the psychedelic dream had turned nightmare.
Mark Duguid

Wednesday 4 May 2011

FS2 Exam Topics

Main study areas and topic within each area to study for the exam. You may not be able to cover them all – but here a range of topics within each area.

Films as products

The global and local dimensions of film
Hollywood
Film Studios
Films as commercial products
Adaptability of the film industry
Filmmaking: the process
Film production, distribution and exhibition


Audiences as fans and consumers

The early cinema experience ( nice to know but unlikely to come up)
Changing patterns of consumption including multi-screen cinemas and home cinema ( a favourite topic in the exam)
The role of the audience in the filmmaking process
Censorship and classification
Fan power
Industry power
Globalization

Hollywood back in the day and Hollywood today – Old Hollywood and New Hollywood
Old Hollywood and New Hollywood. How does Hollywood today compare with the Hollywood of the 1940s-50s?
Actors, directors and agents
Producers
Production: an overview
Distribution in Old Hollywood and New Hollywood

Is the British film industry in any way distinctive and different?
How does it cope with having to survive in the shadow of Hollywood?
A distinctive and different cinema

Tuesday 26 April 2011

Example Exam Questions



The Film Industry

  • To what extent are Hollywood films simply ‘products’ made to make a profit?
  • How important is marketing in influencing people to watch Hollywood films both at the cinema and on DVD?
  • How are billboard posters and poster-style advertisements in newspapers and magazines used to create audiences for films?

The Film Audience

  • What role does the internet now play in enabling people to develop their interest in films?
  • In what ways do factors such as who we watch films with and where we watch films influence our viewing experience and our response to film material?
  • How has the experience of watching films changed in recent years and how do you think it might develop in the future?

Stars

  • To what extent are star images controlled by the film industry?
  • To what extent are fans now able to determine the success or failure of individual stars?
  • What are some of the ways in which fans and the film industry work together to create a star’s image?

Swinging Britain 1963–1973

  • What for you are the most striking uses of narrative construction in the films you have studied?
  • Do the directors of the films you have studied employ narrative in particular ways to say make comment on class in this period?
  • The films of Swinging Britain are essentially about freedom.  Discuss how the films you have studied present freedom.
  • Is there any benefit to understanding the narrative structures in the films of Swinging Britain in exploring the cultural context of the films you have studied?
  • What particular Micro aspects employed in the films you have studied are significant in advancing either Narrative or Genre in the Swinging Britain period?

AS Film Studies : Exam Requirements

What do I need to know about the contemporary UK and US industries?


With regard to the US film industry, the basics of: - the ways in which ‘deals’ are made and projects put into production, including the relative power of stars and directors
- the importance of genre and ‘series’ films
- global marketing and distribution
- conglomeration and its significance
- distinctions between ‘studio’ and more ‘independent’ films

With regard to the UK film industry, the basics of::
- ways in which UK films are financed and production supported
- characteristic types of UK film – including genre
- the marketing and distribution of relatively low budget films
- ways of finding international markets, and the tensions in doing so
- limitations of the UK film industry and policies for addressing these


What should you highlight as important in considering the Star topic option?


Star study has specific elements. Traditionally the distinction has been made between actual person – roles – screen persona – wider media image. Whether studying Julie Christie or Ewan McGregor films it should be possible to explore the interesting tensions across these. However, the topic is more modest in its ambition and, as with the other topics, focuses on narrative and representation.
Here are two questions that can be asked:
• Is the star associated with a particular kind of narrative film?
• Does the star embody particular traits that relate to issues of representation?


What is Swinging Britain 1963 – 1973?


 How progressive was Britain in the 60s and early 70s? How far did a social and style revolution
extend beyond the metropolitan areas? To some degree this topic is dealing with a myth of cultural history and possibly inviting the question: how far did cinema contribute to this myth? The time frame of this option begins after the ‘kitchen sink’ new wave of the late 50s and early 60s. The films for this option are nearly all characterised by some radical or transgressive or fantasy element or mark a shift in social and
moral attitudes.

British & American Film – Section C



Historical genre comparison :
 Bonnie and Clyde & Natural Born Killers

The work of the best candidates will be distinguished by excellent knowledge and confident understanding of their chosen films and be able to make very detailed and accurate reference to them. In addition there will be a good knowledge of narrative and representation.

Sunday 17 April 2011

British Style Genius - The Origins Of '60's Fashion





















.
An excellent BBC series on youth culture and fashions
www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsAwqT61Gzg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7SjJt6fjr4&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pbm6_FqjEHA&feature=related

Swinging Britain 1963-1973





















AS Film Studies Textbook Chapter

Swinging London

Mod Culture

Youth Culture

The Who : My Generation (1965)
The original Mod anthem, a put-down of the morals and values of the older generation and a  glorious celebration of British youth culture before Woodstock and the birth of the hippie. 

Bob Dylan : Subterranean Homesick Blues (1965)
The template for all protest songs - in less than three minutes Dylan debunks the myths surrounding the American Dream.

Barry McGuire : Eve Of Destruction (1965)
A pop cash-in riding on the coat tails of Dylan, this song reads like a bunch of headlines torn from the front pages of the popular press.

Pink Floyd : Arnold Layne (1967)
An early example of British psychedelia which leans heavily on the writings of Edward Lear and Lewis Carroll.

The Beatles : Hello Goodbye (1967)
The Fab Four decked out in their full Sgt. Pepper finery. They had their first hit in December '62, but already the signs of discontent are there. Having ditched their boy-band past ( see ' A Hard Days Night ' ) their music was becoming increasingly experimental. In 1969 John Lennon announced that he was quitting, and by 1970 they were gone, leaving a massive footprint on the face of popular culture.  

The Small Faces : Itchycoo Park (1967)
A classic piece of British psychedelic pop which merges English sensibility with American hippie idealism. The Small Faces, along with The Beatles, The Kinks,Pulp and Blur, can be described as quintissently ' English ' in their outlook.
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJzcF0v1eOE

The Rolling Stones : Street Fighting Man (1968)
Inspired by student demonstrations in Grosvenor Square and the Paris riots of '68. The writer of this lyric is now Sir Mick Jagger. Draw your own conclusions.

John Lennon : John Sinclair (1970)
A song protesting about the imprisonment of John Sinclair, manager of The MC5, a proto-punk political band from Detroit. At the time Lennon was under investigation from both the FBI and CIA. Heavy !!!

T.Rex : Get It On (1971)
The turn of the decade saw a younger generation begin to influence the direction of popular music, with T.Rex spearheading a movement labelled ' Glam Rock '. Check out a young Elton John on piano ! Glam was a direct response to the boring hippie music listened to by the elder brothers and sisters of the kids who were teenagers in 1971.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XspsJACj8WY&feature=related

Mott The Hoople : All The Young Dudes (1972)
The ultimate Glam Rock anthem, this tune casts aside the values of the '60's generation and looks forward to the dawn of a new era. During the course of this song ( written by David Bowie), they dismiss The Beatles and The Stones while extolling the virtues of T.Rex. 

David Bowie : Drive In Saturday (1973)
The single most important musical artist to come out of the UK, Bowie drew heavily on  Stanley Kubrick films such as 2001 and A Clockwork Orange. Listen carefully and you'll hear him name check Twiggy in the chorus, along with Carl Jung and The Rolling Stones. This song draws on the work of Philip K. Dick, William Burroughs and employs a kind of future nostalgia in looking forward to a world where humans have lost the means of one to one communication and so look to technology in order to enrich their lives. In other words...a bit like today. 

AS Film Studies : Get Carter

















Plot Synopsis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Get_Carter

Official Movie Trailer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgU1L1z-Zx4

Get Carter Fan Site
http://www.btinternet.com/~mark.dear/carterindex.htm

Mike Hodges Interview
http://www.screendaily.com/reports/one-on-one/mike-hodges/5024871.article

AS Film Studies : The Wicker Man













Plot Synopsis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wicker_Man_(1973_film)

Official Movie Trailer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FdV-O8o7ok

Excellent 3-part BBC Documentary
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FdV-O8o7ok
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1GF3O1pVUE&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSMeZUIv-xM&feature=related

The Wicker Man Website
http://www.wicker-man.com/

Tuesday 12 April 2011

AS Film Studies : Don't Look Now


















Film Synopsis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don't_Look_Now

Original Film Trailer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYICwstBwnM

BBC Culture Show Analysis
http://www.bbc.co.uk/learningzone/clips/interview-with-director-nicolas-roeg/10120.html

AS Film Studies : Blow - Up











Plot Synopsis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blowup

Original Trailer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Xz1utzILj4&feature=related

AS Film Studies : Julie Christie





















Profile
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julie_Christie

Interview
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QMwYNOMavo

AS Film Studies Textbook Chapter
http://cw.routledge.com/textbooks/9780415454339/downloads/christie.pdf

AS Film Studies : Performance



























Plot Synopsis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performance_(film)

Memo From Turner
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3qgmVb4-kU

Nic Roeg
http://www.screenonline.org.uk/people/id/456125/

The Making Of Performance Documentary
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGmZYKm7FGo&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fikZwrIOpyQ&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5pTz3YneCU&feature=related

AS Film Studies : A Clockwork Orange


Plot Synopsis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Clockwork_Orange_(film)

A Clockwork Orange Documentary
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPW8Ek1BNSA&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOupYjbVEMA&feature=related

Stanley Kubrick Biography
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Kubrick

AS Film Studies : Billy Liar
















Synopsis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billy_Liar_(film)


Original Film Trailer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billy_Liar

AS Film Studies : A Hard Days Night




















A Hard Days Night

Film Synopsis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Hard_Day's_Night_(film)

Full Movie
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkKra3_pfBY

Documentary
http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XMjA4NzE0NTQ4.html

Script
http://www.aellea.com/script/ahdn.htm

Film Terms

Using these terms will help you to analyse and explain moving image sequences in film, television or advertising.


Framing
What’s included and excluded in an individual shot.

Very long shot/wide shot
A shot in which figures appear small in the landscape. Often used at the beginning of a film or sequence as an ‘establishing shot’ to show where the action is taking place; also used to make a figure appear small or isolated.
Long shot
A shot in which a figure can be seen from head to toe.
Mid shot
Shows the figure from approximately the waist to the head. In a mid shot, you can easily recognise an individual but you can also see what they are doing with their hands.
Medium close up
From chest to head
Close-up
Head and shoulders, enabling you to easily see facial expressions, so you can see what characters are thinking and feeling
Big close up
Head only, used when expressions are important
Extreme close-up
From just above the eyebrows to just below the mouth, or even closer: used to emphasise facial expression or to make the subject appear threatening.

Other useful terms for shots are:
Two shot
Any shot with two people in it
Point of view shot
A shot from a character’s point of view
Reaction shot
A shot showing a character’s expression as they react to something
Noddy
A type of reaction shot used in interviews, where we see the interviewer apparently reacting to the interviewee
Over-the-shoulder shot
A shot in which we see a character over another’s shoulder, often used in interviews or dialogues
Lens
The type of lens, and how it’s used, can make a big difference to the meaning of a shot.
Wide-angle shot (taken with a wide-angle lens)
This has the effect of seeming to exaggerate perspective. It's often used to make the viewer feel that they are close to the action. If it's used for closeups, it makes the nose look bigger and the ears smaller ­ an effect usually used for comedy.
Telephoto shot
Like using a telescope, a telephoto lens appears to bring the subject closer and flatten out perspective. It also usually reduces depth of field.
Zoom lenses
These can vary the angle of view, from wideangle to telephoto, so that the subject appears to move closer (or further away) without the camera itself moving.
Depth of field
This means how much of the shot seems to be in focus, in front of and behind the subject.
Deep focus
Everything in the shot appears to be in focus, which means that we can be looking at action taking place in the foreground, middle ground and background.
Shallow focus
Isolates the subject from the background.

Camera position
Where the camera is in relation to the subject.
Low angle shot
The camera points upwards, usually making the subject or setting seem grand or threatening.
High angle shot
The camera looks down, making the subject look vulnerable or insignificant.
Bird’s eye shot
Looks vertically down at the subject.
Camera movements
Track
Moving the camera itself towards or away from the subject, or to follow a moving subject. (Not to be confused with a zoom, where the camera’s lens is varied to give the impression of moving closer to, or away from the subject.)
Pan
Pivoting the camera to the side to scan a scene or to follow a moving subject.
Whip pan
A sudden, fast pan.
Tilt
Pivoting the camera vertically up or down.
Arc
Moving the camera in an arc around the subject.
Crane shot
A shot where the camera itself moves up or down.
Hand-held shot
This is used to convey a sense of immediacy.

Lighting
Lighting can be high or low contrast and can vary in colour and direction.
High-key
The lighting is bright and relatively low in contrast ­ often used for Hollywood musical comedies.
Low-key
Much more pronounced shadows and dramatic contrasts.
Lighting from below
This can be used to make a subject appear threatening or horrific.
Backlighting
Produces a ‘halo’ effect around the edges of the subject.
Colour
Cold or blueish lighting can convey a sense of cold, alienation or technology, while warm or yellowish lighting can be used to convey comfort, sunset and so on. If colours are very rich and intense they are described as saturated.
Black-and-white or sepia can be used to show that a scene is set in the past, or to suggest sophistication.
Mise-en-scène
This means the way in which objects, scenery and the location are shown by using light and dark, pattern, colour, camera position and angle, and movement within the frame. Mise-en-scene establishes mood and atmosphere, and can express the inner life of characters through the way in which their settings are depicted on screen.

Editing
How the individual shots are put together.
There are two main types of editing which you will encounter in mainstream films and TV programmes:
Continuity editing
The majority of film sequences are edited so that time seems to flow, uninterrupted, from shot to shot. Within a ‘continuity editing’ sequence, only cuts will be used. Continuity editing can also involve ‘cross-cutting’, where a sequence cuts between two different settings where action is taking place at the same time.
Montage
In montage, different images are assembled to build up an impression. This is often used in title sequences. The most famous example of this technique is the Odessa Steps sequence from Battleship Potemkin.
Editing can vary both in pace (how long individual shots stay on the screen for) and in the transitions between shots.
Transitions describe the way in which one shot replaces the previous one:
Cut
One image is suddenly replaced by another, without a visible transition.
Cross-dissolve
One image dissolves into another. This can be used to make a montage sequence - eg the title sequence - flow smoothly; it can also be used in continuity editing to show that we have moved forwards in time and/or space.
Fade up
An image gradually fades in
Fade out
An image gradually fades out.
Fades to and from black usually mean that time has passed
Wipe
One image replaces another without dissolving, with the border between the images moving across or around the screen.

Sound
Diegetic sound
Sound that we think is part of what’s going on on the screen ­ horse’s hooves, the sound of thunder, and so on ­ even though many of these will have been added later by a ‘Foley artist’.
Non-diegetic sound
Sound that we know is not part of what’s on screen, such as music (unless there's an orchestra in shot!) and voiceover.
Sound bridge
This uses sound to link two scenes, by having the picture and the diegetic sound change at different points. Usually the sound from the second scene is heard before we start to see the picture from that scene.
©2002 Media Education Wales